RUBYMOTION VS MACRUBY CODE
RUBYMOTION VS MACRUBY TV

# And one to do something a little more complex.

' Problem executing script: ', name)Īpp = Autodesk::AutoCAD::ApplicationServices::Applicationĭoc = Įd.WriteMessage ' Our test command works!' If the file exists, let's load and execute itīool ret = System.IO. Private static bool ExecuteRubyScript( string file) filename as the result of the functionĮxecuteRubyScript( Convert. If we manage to execute it, let's return the Which should be the filename of our script

RUBYMOTION VS MACRUBY TV

TypedValue tv = ( TypedValue )args.GetValue(0) We're only really interested in the first argument Public ResultBuffer RubyLoadLISP( ResultBuffer rb)Įd.WriteMessage( ' Error: too few arguments ' ) Public static void RubyLoad( bool useCmdLine)Īpplication. You’ll clearly also need to reference the usual acmgd.dll and acdbmgd.dll. You’ll need to add project references to IronRuby.dll,, and, all of which can be found in IronRuby’s bin folder.

RUBYMOTION VS MACRUBY CODE

Here is the C# code defining our RBLOAD command. I’m leaving the implementations separate, for now, to make it easier for people to work with the languages independently. The code to do this is very similar to that needed for IronPython, and it should, in fact, be simple enough to templatize the code in some way and combine the two into a single implementation (something I expect Tim Riley will be doing with PyAcad.NET, when he gets the chance). To get started I installed the most recently released version of IronRuby at the time of writing, version 0.3.Īs with IronPython, we’re going to use a C# loader inside AutoCAD to host the IronRuby runtime and use it to interpret a Ruby script. If you Google “python ruby comparison” you should find plenty of opinions out there. This is not something I know enough about to get involved in – even if I wished to – so I’m going to steer well clear of it, and simply show some simple Ruby code that does the same as in the equivalent post for IronPython. That said, the fiercest arguments often seem to occur between people who very nearly agree. NET – the same treatment.įrom what I can tell – and I’m really a newbie in both these languages – there is relatively little to separate the two: both Ruby and Python have their devotees but they ultimately to belong to different sects of the same faith (it’s hard to escape religious analogies when talking about programming languages, for some reason :-). Having spent some time looking into Python, I decided to give Ruby – another popular scrip ting language and one with an “Iron” implementation allowing you to work with.

Rubymotion vs macruby